“ There was only one catch and
that was Catch-22,” stated Doc Daneeka. "That's
some catch, that Catch-22," Yossarian observed.
-Joseph Heller
Research shows that 83% of Downtowners want to walk to work, shopping, and entertainment
venues; yet, the car and its parking remains a hotly contested topic.
CCAC, the community planning and advisory group made up of elected neighborhood
representatives, recently recommended the parking minimum be increased to 1.5
per dwelling unit, no matter the number of bedrooms or unit size.
When the Downtown Community Plan Update was adopted in February, the City Council/Redevelopment
Agency decreased the minimum to 1.0 per unit.
Here’s the Catch-22.
If a set minimum per unit is required,
small studios and MacPenthouses receive the same number
of parking spaces; in this case, one.
This discourages multi-car buyers (families in need of three-bedroom units or
those with a large discretionary income) from living Downtown.
However, requiring a larger parking space minimum increases the cost of construction.
These costs are passed on to the buyer, further increasing the cost of housing
and excluding a larger portion of the population, such as teachers, police officers,
office workers, and again families.
Another vicious cycle is our belief that parking should be free, whether it’s
at work, at our favorite shopping spot, or neighborhood streets.
If developers don’t supply enough spaces, residents are forced to seek
curb parking, leaving no room for guests, service workers, or shoppers. With
curb parking at a premium, traffic increases as cars cruise the streets seeking
the elusive space.
Yet if developers do provide more parking, in addition to the increase of cost
per unit, wouldn’t it mean more cars and fewer units, decreasing the density?
Do we build parking garages for the maximum number of cars, when public and private
garage spaces go unused 50% of the time, or more? Wouldn’t sharing garages
between offices and neighboring housing complexes be one answer? And isn’t
it time to get on with a viable shuttle system for those moments when time and
distance requires four-wheeled transportation?
I ponder…Is Catch-22 just a catchy phrase?
These Downtowners share how parking and living Downtown has changed their daily
lifestyle.
Joseph
Anthony (Acqua Vista) needs
to drive to Salon David Perez to
carry supplies. He would take a
shuttle if available.
Jim
and Carla Bassi (Porto Siena)
are fortunate to have two spaces
and one car. The car rarely leaves
the garage as both walk to work
in the neighborhood.
So does another Little Italy couple, Rita Morares
and Charles Almack. They sold their second car.
If we want to reduce the dependence on cars, and thus lessen the need for more
parking spaces, we need to create jobs for those living in our neighborhoods,
and housing for those working Downtown.
More importantly, it’s essential that we continue making our community
an amazing place to walk; one that is visually engaging so residents will relish
leaving their cars at home, or even sell them! - May 2006